International Journal on Magnetic Particle Imaging IJMPI
Vol. 11 No. 1 Suppl 1 (2025): Int J Mag Part Imag
https://doi.org/10.18416/IJMPI.2025.2503014
System function analysis of MPI with Field-Free Line and excitation coil configurations
Main Article Content
Copyright (c) 2025 Masaomi Washino, Kota Nomura, Tetsuya Matsuda, Satoshi Seino, Takashi Nakagawa, Toshihiko Kiwa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Magnetic Particle Imaging (MPI) visualizes the distribution of magnetic particles using their nonlinear magnetization response. This study evaluated the impact of interference between the Field-Free Line (FFL) and alternating excitation field on system performance. The Coaxial Configuration suppressed interference and provided stable in-phase signals, while the Orthogonal Configuration produced anti-phase signals, reducing sensitivity. The Coaxial Configuration is suitable for wide-area measurements, whereas the Orthogonal Configuration offers high resolution but faces sensitivity challenges.
Article Details
References
[2] J. Weizenecker, B. Gleich, et al., Magnetic particle imaging using a field free line, J. Phys., D41:105009, 2009.
[3] T. Knopp, M. Erbe, S. Biederer, T. F. Sattel, and T. M. Buzug, Efficient generation of a magnetic field-free line, Med. Phys., vol. 37, pp. 3538, 2010.
[4] M. Washino, K. Nomura, K. Yamauchi, T. Matsuda, Y. Susumu, S. Seino, T. Nakagawa, T. Sakane, T. Kiwa and S. Tonooka, Magnetic signal evaluation and imaging of magnetic nanoparticles in brain phantom, Int. J. Mag. Part. Imag., vol. 8, no. 1, Suppl. 1, Mar. 2022.
[5] K. Nomura, M. Washino, T. Matsuda, S. Tonooka, S. Seino, H. Yoshida, K. Nishigaki, T. Nakagawa, and T. Kiwa, Magnetic-Particle-Discrimination Method Using Difference of Relaxation Time for Magnetic Particle Imaging, IEEE Magn. Lett., vol. 14, pp. 8100105, 2023.